|
Home Themes Regions Tourist Boards Services Search Trips |
![]() |
Current
Issue |
| CulturalTravels.com - Home |
Volume 6, July 2004 |
ISSN 1538-893X |
|
Machu Picchu Abandoned
By Gary
Ziegler,
Adventure Specialists |
|
|
Huayna Capac and an estimated 50 percent of the
population died of smallpox around 1527. Inca governmental capability must have
suffered greatly, resulting in a period of turmoil. The empire fell into civil
war over Inca secession, and it’s likely that Machu Picchu was abandoned at
this time because the cost of maintaining it was prohibitive, and the epidemic
and war had depleted the remaining male population. Machu Picchu, primarily a ceremonial site, had
limited administrative or commercial use and was located on a difficult road in
near impassable terrain in the high cloud forest. It had little military value,
located so high above an unnavigable section of the Urubamba River canyon. Most
state- sanctioned traffic movement in Machu Picchu’s general direction to or
from Cuzco and the Sacred Valley upriver would have been mainly via other Inca
roads, either the high road near Salcantay or by the Lucumayo Valley road.
The Incas were apparently able to control their
remarkable state system through a pyramidal hierarchy, with information and
direction flowing down through 10 overseers to 100, to a 1,000 and so on. We
know from Spanish historians and the archaeological record that they did not
possess an alphabet or written language, although they certainly must have
utilized some symbols and diagrams. We know that the quipu (a collection of
colored strings and knots) was extensively used as an accounting and record
keeping device. This required a trained interpreter/programmer to accompany it.
Although the quipu was known and used during the early colonial period, the
technique for “reading” one was not documented and lost to history. The Inca
also maintained a class or guild of oral historians who could recite detailed
stories. What records the Inca state may have kept and how remain a mystery. With the catastrophic collapse of Inca social
structure following arrival of the Spanish, these specialists/historians were
scattered and forgotten. The Spanish, most of whom were illiterate, uneducated
adventurers, had little interest in seeking or preserving anything not producing
wealth and power. By the time scholars and responsible administrators arrived,
the information was lost. When the conquering Pizarro arrived in Cuzco in
1532, Machu Picchu must have been mostly forgotten, and the few who remembered
died without revealing its location to the Spanish. Machu Picchu or whatever its
name at the time, would not have been of much importance to either the crumbling
Inca state or the treasure-hungry Spanish. Manco Inca staged a country wide rebellion in 1536.
After a failed siege of Cuzco, Manco, along with remnants of the court, army and
followers, abandoned his headquarters at Ollantaytambo. Fleeing back into the
remote Vilcabamba beyond Machu Picchu, he burned and destroyed Inca settlements
and sites accessible to the Spanish. One of them was Patallacta, located at the
start of the now famous trail to Machu Picchu from the Urubamba River. Of
course, by this time the trail and the site itself would have been long
overgrown and the approach blocked by seasonal landslides that so hinder
backcountry travel in Peru. (Beyond personal observations and many trips to
Machu Picchu, I have borrowed heavily from the excellent work of Michael
Moseley, John Hemming, John Rowe and Johan Reinhard. Their writings are a must
for anyone attempting an understanding of the Inca and the centuries of cultural
development that preceded them.)
|
|
To receive a FREE email version of our monthly newsletter just fill in the Key Interest form |